But the law is fair.
If you can prove your case the court will rule in your favour.
Unless of course the judge was bribed. But that’s
another story..
Let’s take the case of Dolce and Banana,
a small business in Hout Bay that manufactures and sells
hand made jewellery and accessories using local crafters
and local materials, and has been operating since 1998.
Dolce and Gabbana, the Italian fashion house
has taken the small Hout Bay business to court, demanding
that they rebrand.
In a 300-page affidavit submitted to the Western Cape High
court by Christiana Ruella, a board member of Gado, Dolce
& Gabbana's holding company, D&B alleges
"The name Dolce and Banana makes a mockery of the well-known
trademark, Dolce & Gabbana,"
Shop owner Mijou Beller immediately, at
a cost of R10000.00, changed the shop’s name to …Banana.
‘We don’t have the money to fight them’
she said.
Now Dolce and Gabbana wants her to pay R100 000.00 of the
R200 000.0 costs incurred by taking the case to court.
I would have fought them.
I would have gone to the high court and explained that I
could not afford fancy advocates and I would have asked
for permission to defend myself.
How does a shop that sells handcrafted jewellery
made from beads and shells by local crafters ‘make
a mockery of a well-known trademark?’
The Italian word ‘Dolce’ means
‘Sweet.’
Please do not tell me I am not allowed to call my brand
Sweet and Banana.
Besides that, the name Dolce and Banana
is not even original or exclusive to the Hout Bay Shop.
Among
quite a few others, there is an organisation in Pennsylvania
that raises awareness of diabetes called Dolce and
Banana. |
|
|
In the University
of Queensland’s Union Complex there is a yoghurt
shop called Dolce and Banana. |
And in China there is a label called Dolce
and Banana that actually produces counterfeit Dolce and
Gabbana stuff!
So why does Dolce and Gabbana not sue these
people?
Because they know That in the US they will lose the case
and in China they would probably get mysteriously karated..
That’s why.
Kader
Khan